Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-7400T - 101 vs 100 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $63.5 vs $80.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.64 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280311 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
100
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |