Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 309 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $80.0 vs $99.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i3-9100T - $0.15 vs $0.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 3200G - 527 vs 522 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
522
99.05123339658444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353879 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
527
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
78.94736842105263%
Price, $
$99
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353879 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
87.44804655029094%
Multi-Core
3013
94.8080553807426%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i3-9100T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |