Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 326 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $150.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 20% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-11600K - $0.9 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 3 3300X - 176 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
167
94.88636363636364%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358079 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
79.64601769911506%
Price, $
$198.9
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358079 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Single-Core
1670
76.39524245196706%
Multi-Core
5793
67.52535260519875%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |