Buy on Amazon
$150
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $120
Availability
MSRP in USD: $120
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3393 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Core i5-2400S - 178 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $70.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.43 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
51.19047619047619%
Price, $
$150
46%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360469 minutes ago
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
163
91.57303370786516%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360468 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
29.700598802395213%
Multi-Core
1352
23.338511997238047%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
