Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $70.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 33% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10400F - $0.45 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2400S - 168 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
155
92.26190476190477%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349412 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
67.16417910447761%
Price, $
$112.53
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349413 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
34.4923504867872%
Multi-Core
1352
23.508954964354025%
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |