Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-7500T - 592 vs 522 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $69.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.13 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359673 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
522
88.17567567567568%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359674 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1110
66.46706586826348%
Multi-Core
3076
53.098567236319695%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |