Buy on Amazon
$69
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500T outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than FX-8350 - 197 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than FX-8350 - $69.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Valheim than FX-8350 - $0.35 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349152 minutes ago
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
96.44670050761421%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
36.08247422680412%
Price, $
$185
37%
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
