Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 3374 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 9% better in Valorant than Core i7-920 - 739 vs 680 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $90.0 vs $135.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen 5 2400G - $0.13 vs $0.18 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
739
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
72.22222222222223%
Price, $
$135
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358130 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
680
92.01623815967524%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
39.26206244087039%
Multi-Core
1434
43.533697632058285%
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |