Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1178 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $132.0 vs $522.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-13900K - $3.07 vs $5.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 137% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 5 3400G - 102 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
43
42.15686274509804%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$132
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.13/FPS
59.84405458089669%
Price, $
$522.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348904 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
37.92871553463349%
Multi-Core
3619
17.96208060353385%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |