Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 113 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $132.0 vs $535.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-9900KS - $3.07 vs $8.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 65 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 49% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 5 3400G - 64 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
43
67.1875%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$132
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.36/FPS
36.72248803827751%
Price, $
$535
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
63.370786516853926%
Multi-Core
3619
42.10097719869707%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 127 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |