Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 185 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 9% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-10400F - 199 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $112.53 vs $535.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-9900KS - $0.61 vs $2.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 65 vs 127 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.69/FPS
22.676579925650557%
Price, $
$535
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
91.95979899497488%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
80.78651685393258%
Multi-Core
5751
66.90321079571893%
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |