Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2260 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 41% better in Starfield than FX-6350 - 62 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
44
70.96774193548387%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |