Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $210.0 vs $299.98
- Up to 21% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900 - $3.75 vs $4.76 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 12% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 2700X - 63 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
56
88.88888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$3.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350013 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.76/FPS
78.78151260504202%
Price, $
$299.98
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1245
73.06338028169014%
Multi-Core
6113
72.59232870205439%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |