Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1033 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 34% better in Dead Island 2 than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 207 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 32 vs 16 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Renoir | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
