Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1041 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 240 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 32 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Renoir | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
