Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 2501 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron 3205U - 183 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |