Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2874 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 38% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron 3205U - 193 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
