Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive FX-4300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1820 is 404 days newer than the more expensive FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than FX-4300 - 163 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than FX-4300 - $46.41 vs $48.02
- Up to 7% better value when playing God of War than FX-4300 - $0.28 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280643 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280643 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |