Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1545 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i7-860 - $46.41 vs $48.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-860 - $0.26 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280648 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280648 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |