Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 639 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1820 - 192 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - $39.95 vs $46.41
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1820 - $0.21 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
191
99.47916666666666%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
87.5%
Price, $
$46.41
86%
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354179 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
84.50946643717728%
Multi-Core
825
83.16532258064517%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |