Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2956 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $46.41 vs $153.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-12400 - $0.24 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 214 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
190
88.78504672897196%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349036 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
33.80281690140845%
Price, $
$153
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349036 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
22.533272143184945%
Multi-Core
825
9.325194981349611%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |