Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $46.41 vs $160.68
- Up to 66% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600KF - $0.42 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1820 - 130 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
111
85.38461538461539%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349162 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
33.87096774193548%
Price, $
$160.68
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
22.358834244080146%
Multi-Core
825
9.475134948891696%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |