Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3321 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $46.41 vs $147.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-13100 - $0.28 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 53 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1820 - 206 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
168
81.55339805825243%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
38.88888888888889%
Price, $
$147.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
21.79316466932978%
Multi-Core
825
11.244377811094452%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |