Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $46.41 vs $240.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-11900KF - $1.93 vs $2.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 238% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1820 - 81 vs 24 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
24
29.629629629629626%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
81
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.96/FPS
65.2027027027027%
Price, $
$240
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
21.191195511437204%
Multi-Core
825
8.148148148148149%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |