Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $46.41 vs $205.5
- Up to 74% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-10700KF - $0.42 vs $1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1820 - 125 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
111
88.8%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
25.609756097560975%
Price, $
$205.5
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $205.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
28.88235294117647%
Multi-Core
825
10.20660645799827%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |