Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1404 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $46.41 vs $192.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-8700K - $0.33 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 53 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1820 - 189 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
141
74.60317460317461%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349037 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
32.35294117647059%
Price, $
$192
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $192 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
31.036662452591656%
Multi-Core
825
12.804594133167779%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |