Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4130 is 730 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i3-4130 - $39.95 vs $43.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-4130 - $0.27 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3900 - 155 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280639 minutes ago
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280641 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |