Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2184 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Core i7-860 - 164 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-860 - $39.95 vs $48.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-860 - $0.24 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280631 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280631 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |