Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-4300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than FX-4300 - 177 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than FX-4300 - $39.95 vs $48.02
- Up to 15% better value when playing Stray than FX-4300 - $0.23 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354165 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
176
99.43502824858757%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
85.18518518518519%
Price, $
$48.02
83%
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |