Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2020 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2020 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1443 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2020.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G2020 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Pentium G2020 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2020
- Up to 64% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $34.99 vs $98.02
- Up to 63% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.3 vs $0.82 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
36.58536585365854%
Price, $
$98.02
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349766 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
FPS
118
98.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349766 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Single-Core
476
78.28947368421053%
Multi-Core
817
78.33173537871524%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Pentium G2020 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 21st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |