Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 1220 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930 - 179 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $43.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930 - $0.24 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
95.53072625698324%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
42.10526315789474%
Price, $
$98.02
43%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349762 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349763 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
61.10552763819096%
Multi-Core
1043
53.214285714285715%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |