Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 98 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 125 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $42.88 vs $98.02
- Up to 59% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.34 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
41.463414634146346%
Price, $
$98.02
43%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349757 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
64.06743940990516%
Multi-Core
1043
33.666881859264045%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |