Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 596 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 22% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $50.0 vs $63.83
- Up to 17% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Athlon 3000G - $0.4 vs $0.48 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 132 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
94.6969696969697%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349405 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
83.33333333333334%
Price, $
$63.83
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
64.36781609195403%
Multi-Core
1051
53.21518987341772%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |