Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1541 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 11% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3900 - 161 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 37% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $39.95 vs $63.83
- Up to 30% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Athlon 3000G - $0.28 vs $0.4 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349518 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
90.06211180124224%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
60.71055381400209%
Multi-Core
992
50.22784810126583%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |