Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 122 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $94.98 vs $109.99
- Up to 27% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.78 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 58 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280294 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
84%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
72%
Price, $
$109.99
86%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |