Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3655 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - $70.0 vs $339.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-13700 - $0.63 vs $2.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 22% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3210 - 135 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
111
82.22222222222221%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
Buy for $339.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
19.338905775075986%
Multi-Core
1018
6.897486279558236%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |