Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $70.0 vs $283.35
- Up to 38% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900KF - $2.8 vs $4.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 152% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3210 - 63 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 20 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
25
39.682539682539684%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.5/FPS
62.22222222222222%
Price, $
$283.35
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
28.8712422007941%
Multi-Core
1018
11.120821498798339%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |