Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2378 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800X - $70.0 vs $284.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 7 3800X - $2.8 vs $4.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 144% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3210 - 61 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
25
40.98360655737705%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.66/FPS
60.08583690987124%
Price, $
$284
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $284 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
30.029498525073745%
Multi-Core
1018
11.979289244528124%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |