Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 485 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Pentium G630 - 274 vs 272 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G630 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $37.49 vs $70.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3210 - $0.14 vs $0.26 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
53.846153846153854%
Price, $
$70
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349753 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
272
99.27007299270073%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |