Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 973 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3210 - 276 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $39.95 vs $70.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3210 - $0.14 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 51 vs 55 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
274
99.27536231884058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
53.846153846153854%
Price, $
$70
57%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349759 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349759 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |