Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 334 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $46.41 vs $70.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3210 - $0.39 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 53 vs 55 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349757 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
96.46365422396856%
Multi-Core
825
81.04125736738703%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |