Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1988 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $79.0 vs $135.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 5 2400G - $0.59 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 20% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3220 - 160 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
133
83.125%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349098 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
70.23809523809523%
Price, $
$135
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
49.668874172185426%
Multi-Core
1085
32.93867638129933%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |