Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1641 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $79.0 vs $195.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.56 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 15% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3220 - 163 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
142
87.11656441717791%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
46.66666666666667%
Price, $
$195
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348919 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
52.23880597014925%
Multi-Core
1085
21.274509803921568%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |