Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 603 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $41.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-2600K - $0.15 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3240 - 278 vs 275 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
275
98.92086330935251%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
82.93413173652695%
Multi-Core
1137
49.008620689655174%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |