Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2060 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $43.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-9700F - $0.27 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-4130 - 188 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
162
86.17021276595744%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349389 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
13.043478260869568%
Price, $
$389.88
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
64.23499031633312%
Multi-Core
1960
31.32992327365729%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |