Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $48.0 vs $218.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11500 - $0.41 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11500 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4150 - 128 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
117
91.40625%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
23.976608187134502%
Price, $
$218.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $218.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
52.15430861723447%
Multi-Core
2047
27.57273706896552%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |