Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $48.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-10700F - $0.24 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i3-4150 - 204 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
196
96.07843137254902%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349036 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
21.62162162162162%
Price, $
$225.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
64.57816377171216%
Multi-Core
2047
28.308670999861707%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |