Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $48.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-11900K - $0.3 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 13% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-4150 - 183 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
162
88.52459016393442%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
20.689655172413794%
Price, $
$265
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
43.90552509489667%
Multi-Core
2047
18.69747899159664%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |