Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 151 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 15% better in Rust than Celeron G1820 - 179 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G1820 - $0.27 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - $46.41 vs $48.0
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280565 minutes ago
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280564 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |