Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 970 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G630 - 123 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Pentium G630 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $37.49 vs $219.95
- Up to 82% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4150T - $0.32 vs $1.79 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
17.877094972067038%
Price, $
$219.95
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361379 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
117
95.1219512195122%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361380 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |